simonas svitra | photo diary
current   |   archives   |   rss   |   about
eating shit and other moral issues
previous next

eating shit and other moral issues

Published 2010/02/10

Dad, can you identify this one for me, please:) I’m pretty sure it’s some kind a shit beetle, but it would sound great in Latin!

I found this beetle on my way to the rubbish hill, it was big enough to stop me in my tracks. Just big while being small, just living it’s life while being a part of something bigger. Right here, social associations arise for me, those years at the university wasn’t a waste of time:)

So, to the point. How much shit can you eat and still retain your inner self? I’m talking about very simple things here – before becoming big, you have to start being small. Socially, I mean, while living in a society (unless you were born deep in the jungle, it’s pretty much the same in all other places), you got to obtain a status. This varies a lot, but commonly, this means you have to integrate in your social surroundings, usually, in our beloved capitalist state, this works by becoming financially independent. In fact, you get a lot of social pressure while taking your choices, what makes them somewhat very limited. But you still can choose.

Back to retaining your identity, where is the line that you would never cross? This touches moral issues the most. For example: Would you do things that you find very wrong, if you are paid well? Could you talk lies just to comfort the person who’s paying you? Would you play a rigged game if you knew it was rigged? There are many more, and a lot of people do much more than I could think of. And they always find someone else to blame, like politicians, and they always find an excuse – there are too many to start with – and the social pressure only makes those excuse more valid.

So in these difficult times, the times of world economic crisis, a dog eats a dog. I have a feeling, that moral issues are becoming somewhat more and more distant on a daily basis. Or am I wrong? Perhaps I happened to have the wrong experience? Feel free to tell me your version of this story.

The reason I’m so sensitive to these issues is that I’ve always tried to stay loyal to my beliefs. Not lying, not faking, trying not to hurt anyone, not doing things that I find missleading to others. I’ve not always succeeded, but I remember those times for sure, and repeating that is the last thing I want to do.

I was always confident, in fact, I still am, that you don’t have to eat the shit to become bigger. All you need to do is take your time and think with your own head. And don’t loose your head – it is not replaceable. Only the brain is washable.. Just make sure you’re in the right laundry. How? Listen to your heart, it never lies.

12 comments to “eating shit and other moral issues”

  1. author: Father
    February 10th, 2010 at 11:31 PM

    Sorry, but the beetle is not associated with shit…, neither with rubbish. It is parasite of wild bees, that usually like warm sandy places. You can read more about there: http://www.entomologai.lt/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=101&Itemid=85&lang=lt

    The beetle you have taken on your photo seems to be very like this one (Meloe tuccius):
    http://www.maltawildplants.com/!gfx/Nature/maltawildlife.php?species=Meloe+tuccius&ext=&type=

    Or some other species from this gallery:
    http://www.meloidae.com/meloidae/thumbnails.php?album=117

  2. author: adomas
    February 11th, 2010 at 9:45 AM

    Wow, nice text. “How much shit can you eat and still retain your inner self?” is the quote of the day, graffiti on the wall of Ministry of Justice, and a beginning of zen master’s dharma talk.
    What goes for ‘moral’, think how it differs from ‘ethical’. It might be worth analyzing the distinction. What I mean, some actions may be not ‘moral’(not adhering to public ‘mores’ or policies, like it’s not appropriate to hold hands for unmarried couple in Iran) but still be ethical and desirable. And as I hear you, would you agree that ‘identity’ in your text might be replaceable with ‘integrity’ of your actions? (Otherwise, what kind of ‘identity’ does empty boat have?)
    Then, think of ‘desire’, that might be the keyword for unlocking the inner-google-engine for more irreparable questions, more dark beetles and and more enlightened shit.

  3. author: simonas
    February 11th, 2010 at 11:57 AM

    thanks bro, i’ll google myself a bit further and get back to you!

  4. author: Leopold Bloom
    February 11th, 2010 at 1:45 PM

    How much shit do you have to throw around in order to be able to say “I”?

    The ‘inner self’ is a lie that allows us to fall for other lies such as financial independence (an oxymoron in itself) – is it to be found in the motion of transition from being dependent on ones parents to being dependent on ones boss? This I is but a collection of bits and pieces of everything that composes me and “I” is a tiny part of it, something that can appear in the middle of the ocean and pronounce its name. Identity is the visibility of this collection confused with the being itself. Only someone fully convinced with the lie of the “I” can become a paranoiac-body in the capitalist system, fearing the invasion, a certain take-over from the ‘outside’. The question should be not that of retaining the purity of ones body but that of how and who is granted the power to design the affects that make the I of me – a boyfriend, a friend, a philosopher, a writer and, most important, a slave; and, of course, how is to be destroyed?

    Since you aknowledge that we live in a capitalist – hence class, alienated, submissive – system, the question of morals lies obsolete because capitalism has no soul of which morals once was a substance. Any kind of moralistic discourse in todays capitalism is but an attempt to electrify the emptiness among the configuration of apparatuses that make up the capitalist system, or in more precise terms capitalist space. Ecology of today illustrates this perfectly: supermarkets unite with doomsaying sociologists to sell their greenest indulgencies for the (existential) bourgeoisie that started feeling the guilt. In times of bourgeoisie construction workers and proletarian managers any kind of morals should be left among the other religious rot such as Class War, Heaven and Hell, Citizen vs. State and dehydrated shopper-activism. In capitalism lies – moral or otherwise – are utilised to conceal the truth that already lies in the metaphysical, that is ungraspable unseen.

    The ethical questions should be revised since ethics is built on truth that will never be grasped. The obsolete truths (lies without a substance) must be rethought. Can we still think in the same terms when the alienation has reached such a point that any kind of contact is met with hysterics? Can we still denounce violence when our attempts to reduce its level through distancing proved to be the most violent means of communication possible? Can we refuse a certain lie when everything, even the refusal itself, has been reduced to lies? The ethical question would be not that of whether one should lie or speak truth but ‘how do I lie?’ and ‘how do I speak truth?’; not that of whether one should or should not hurt others but ‘how do I hurt?’ and ‘how do I act gentle?’ In the world turned upside down a destructive lie to ones professor, boss, father, manager, cop or revolutionary can be a genuine act of love. The same goes for violence. And the same goes for planting flowers.

    The ethican questions posed here are not mere denunciations of ‘traditional’ truths that smell of conservatism. It is tradition-put-to-motion. Ethics is a starting point for regrouping of bodies, assuming of hostilities and taking-place in a world not worth saving.

  5. author: aurimas
    February 11th, 2010 at 3:32 PM

    While reading I was to say that there is no such thing as identity and thought of refering to Adomas, but I see he already said that :)

    Interesting how much you can think or blabber of a single image of what you think is a shit beetle. Espiacially when it’s actually not a shit beetle. Resemblance is the power. Now think how the poor thing feels just being mistaken with the shit beetle just because it is similar to the image of the shit beetle floating in the pool of our common narative database :) And who are we? Just a bunch egocentric apes! :)

  6. author: simonas
    February 12th, 2010 at 2:35 AM

    i wish i could blabber more, leave my beetle alone;)

  7. author: simonas
    February 12th, 2010 at 2:40 AM

    joa, manau cia tuccius…

  8. author: Stanislav Krejcik
    February 12th, 2010 at 4:34 AM

    On the picture is Meloe tuccius tuccius Rossi, 1792
    The specie in collect: http://www.meloidae.com/meloidae/displayimage.php?pos=-945
    The specie in live: http://www.meloidae.com/thumbnails.php?album=2132

  9. author: adla
    February 12th, 2010 at 9:15 AM

    Simonas, what a success of shit beetle. If this trend continues, and this blog starts getting more than 3 readers per day, you could easily start selling google ads with tags for ‘cheap mood-enhancer’ and ‘herbal solutions for youthful angst’.

  10. author: simonas
    February 12th, 2010 at 11:30 AM

    hehehe;) youthful angst;)

  11. author: Leopold Bloom
    February 12th, 2010 at 2:42 PM

    Shit beetle shit beetle where do you want to go?
    Would you like to get some shit flowers from all the shit you sow?
    The shit could be in color but the quality’s too low
    Still it’s painted purple and the shit is left to grow.

  12. author: Nicky Reiss
    February 28th, 2010 at 5:21 PM

    Sad to say you’re absolutely right. One of these characters is called Simon Wessely, who is British, and is hated by large numbers of people for a very good reason… (see: http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/magical-medicine.pdf). His work has adversely affected millions of people around the world.

Leave a comment

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>